Video editors, give every proposed cut a reason.
Edit Decision Kit
1 skill + 19 prompts. ZIP by email.
Elapsed intervals · transcript only · no media inspected
Supplied input S1–S2 · 60s
We lost the first brief in a chain of messages.
Actual Codex output C1
From scattered brief to recorded decisions
Supplied input S4 · 30s
A board cannot judge the sound for us.
Actual Codex output C2
The closing sound qualification preserves the limit of what a board can do.
Supplied input S5–S6 · 60s
The editor remains responsible for the delivery.
Actual Codex output C3
Speaker handoff and pacing require inspection.
Excerpts from the supplied brief and recorded response. A demonstration of the files, not an included app.
Opens WhatsApp for a manual order.
Manual email delivery within 2 business days after confirmation. AI accounts and tools separate.
Read delivery & refund termsWatch the kit walkthrough.
A demonstration of the written files. Fictional examples; AI accounts and apps are separate.
Read the walkthrough transcript
Video editors, the best line still needs the right cut. You have the interview. Now decide what belongs, what needs context and what still needs checking. That is the work behind the Edit Decision Kit. Its original method takes you through candidate cuts, paper edits, captions, B-roll notes and review decisions. Start with source IDs. Carry the opening and closing words into the proposal. Keep timing assumptions visible. In the fictional Luma Desk transcript, the question about saving half the editing time is followed by a clear denial of measurement. That context belongs with the quote. See the supplied source and the actual method together. You get twenty main items: one original skill and nineteen adapted prompts, selected and documented for this workflow. A brief sheet, style card, decision log and workflow notes come as free extras. The kit is US$39, paid once. Order on WhatsApp for manual email delivery. Bring your own AI account and editing tools. Choose the method, then make the editing decisions yours.
Video credits
Legend Mode Skill / Designer58. Arte própria da encomenda; fonte Anybody OFL1.1 · Legend Mode Skill / síntese original tarefa59. Licença própria da encomenda; uso comercial pela empresa · Voz preset Runway; geração por Patrick / Legend Mode Skill. Runway Usage rights, uso comercial conforme registro central
Anybody font under SIL OFL 1.1; the complete licence is on the credits page. Captions are part of the video image; a text transcript is supplied here.
Put the decision back in your hands
The Edit Decision Kit puts source IDs, candidate cuts, paper edits and review decisions into one written method. One original skill, 19 adapted prompts and separate free extras. Bring the transcript. Work through the decisions. Finish in your own editor.
A great line, but what came before it? A caption, but which spelling was approved? A change request, but who owns it? Build the plan around the actual source. The method asks for the words, the timing basis and the checks still needed before the export.
You are buying a curated collection of written workflows, files, guides and licensed adaptations for this profession.
See what the source becomes.
Fictional input. Real generated text.
Human judgement still required.
Read the actual decision
Use the controls in the opening demonstration to inspect each source and its recorded output. Both remain labelled; the output is an excerpt, not a complete deliverable.
- C1 — S1–S2. Source case 1; response excerpt from the edit-decision-desk trial.
- C2 — S4. Source case 1; response excerpt from the edit-decision-desk trial.
- C3 — S5–S6. Source case 1; response excerpt from the edit-decision-desk trial.
- C1 · S1–S2 · 60 seconds — “Establishes the lost-brief problem, introduces one board, and explains request/decision/owner columns and client approval.” Literal continuation from the same recorded output. Segment timing only; no exact spoken boundaries or media checked. The fictional-project and unmeasured-productivity qualifications remain; the result must be checked in the editing application.
What this proves
A real Codex response exists for this fictional en-US case. The selected text is shown literally. It does not establish a win over another prompt, customer results, time savings or compatibility with other apps.
These examples describe the fictional Luma Desk brief. Its template and onboarding call are not part of the kit sold here.
Completed review: scope and results
Completed internal review, 31 October 2026: five fictional en-US cases in Codex CLI 0.166.0, with a one-line prompt, a good prompt and the original skill. Each response was assessed against five frozen binary rubric criteria. The skill met 25/25 criteria; the good prompt met 25/25 and the one-line prompt 23/25. The skill scored above the good prompt in 0/5 cases and did not pass the predefined threshold of three strict case wins. Ties did not count as wins. This was a local agent assessment of written responses, without external professional validation. The requested model was gpt-6.1-sol, recorded in the headers but not independently confirmed by model JSON. These are documentary rubric results, not measured time savings, productivity, finished media quality, app compatibility or general superiority. Rubric limits remain: some design checks required a CTA absent from the brief; some copy checks required source IDs for supplied conditions without IDs. The rubric was not changed after seeing the outputs.
Final work needs your professional checks.
The method behind the cut
Use edit-decision-desk as a decision desk for the interview: choose the task, supply the source, carry its IDs into the proposal, then review the cut in the timeline. The five sections cover these concrete jobs:
- Candidate cuts: instructions for source IDs, proposed in/out points and context checks.
- Paper edit: a source-to-output table with dialogue, picture proposals and pending checks.
- Captions and glossary: draft instructions that keep spelling and timing questions visible.
- B-roll and temporary narration: written shot briefs and source-linked narration instructions.
- Feedback and export: a decision log and checks for the editor to perform.
Know every file
before you buy.
20 main items.
Free extras kept separate.
20 main items: one original professional skill and 19 adapted third-party prompts. The original sources are publicly available. The price covers the original method, selection, professional adaptations and guide, not exclusive access to those sources. Credits and Apache-2.0 license text are included.
edit-decision-desk
One original professional skill. Five connected tasks. Written instructions you can read and adapt to your own authorised work.
Read all 19 adapted prompt descriptions
- Criteria-led draft review
Review the wording and context of a proposed paper edit against the transcript.
- Work from the supplied context
Answer an editing-brief question from transcript and client instructions only.
- Keep an approved output pattern
Keep the editor’s approved cut-list format using owned examples.
- Extract requirements in source order
Extract requested aspect ratios, durations and caption/export constraints.
- Separate proposal and review roles
Propose edits separately from continuity/context review.
- Structured source summary
Summarise an interview into source-linked topics for decupage.
- Names and spelling ledger
Build a spelling glossary for captions and project references.
- Premise to outline to short draft
Build a short narrative cut in approval stages rather than an uncontrolled long script.
- Scene notes with candidate timecodes
Use during first-pass footage logging when the editor needs a searchable list of visible actions and candidate timecodes before opening each candidate in the timeline.
- Quick footage synopsis
Use when naming and organising a batch of authorised rushes and a short, faithful synopsis is more useful than a full decupage table.
- Classify authorised B-roll
Use when an editor has many authorised B-roll clips and wants candidate subject labels for a controlled bin structure.
- First transcript from authorised audio
Use to request the first revisable speech transcript or a bounded interval before the editor checks names and aligns captions.
- Temporary rhythm and harmony notes
Use optionally when choosing edit pacing against an owned music cue and rough tempo/harmony notes would help the editor audition alternatives.
- Temporary voice direction
Use when a producer needs a clear temporary-read direction to assess script timing before commissioning or recording an approved voice.
- Synthetic B-roll shot brief
Use when a paper edit has a missing illustrative shot and the editor wants to brief a possible synthetic B-roll candidate before deciding whether to generate it.
- Scene-by-scene animatic sheet
Use before an animatic to keep scene image directions, narration and character invariants together for approval.
- Controlled asset tags and descriptions
Use when an asset library needs controlled search tags and concise visible-content descriptions before choosing stills or B-roll references.
- Instrumental temp-track structure
Use when a sequence needs a temp-track direction that follows its beats and leaves room for dialogue before a musician or optional generator is engaged.
- Screenshot review conversation
Use between versions when a still/screenshot and its brief need a visible-change review with decisions preserved for the next pass.
See the separate free extras
- Blank professional brief
Collect approved facts, constraints, rights, format and open questions.
- Blank approved-style card
Record two authorised examples, a rejected example and approved style choices.
- Decision and review log
Track feedback, source, owner, approval and unresolved checks.
- Practical workflow notes PDF + text
A short guide to preparing inputs, asking for useful drafts and reviewing them.
- Synthetic before/after editing reference
Inspect the earlier two-second input and 1.6-second output with the documented frame/sync limits. It is not a kit or app trial.
The original sources are publicly available; the adapted prompts are not exclusive. Use the original material under its included permission and the third-party adaptations under their applicable Apache-2.0 terms. Keep required credits, notices and license text. Restrictions on original material do not override third-party rights. The kit is not endorsed by Google, Anthropic or OpenAI.
Open the files.
Bring your judgement.
Unzip and read
After delivery, unzip the attachment on your own device. Read GUIDE.md, the original skill and the credits before choosing a task.
Prepare an authorised source
Start with an authorized transcript and the timing information you actually have. Choose candidate cuts, a paper edit, captions, B-roll notes or feedback review. Use the relevant instructions with your own AI environment, then compare the draft with the source. Check exact frames, sync, sound and the final export in your editing software.
Review in your own tools
This is a ZIP of written instructions, prompts and references. It does not operate Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, transcribe a recording by itself, or deliver a finished edit. Frame accuracy, sync, sound and export approval remain your checks.
Accounts, plans and installation limits
You need a way to unzip and read text/PDF files. Running a prompt requires your own suitable AI account or text environment; no app installation or compatibility is confirmed for this release. Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini apps have not been tested. Accounts, paid plans, APIs, media tools and credits are not included. Final production uses your own professional tools.
The recorded Codex case is a text trial, not a test of account installation or every item. No plan recommendation or software access is included.
A method you can
make your own.
Edit Decision Kit · United States
USD · one-time payment for the ZIP
Get the kit via WhatsAppOpens WhatsApp. The order and payment are checked manually.
Before payment
Confirm the seller’s identity, kit contents, payment options, final total, currency, any applicable charges, delivery date and cancellation instructions in a record you can keep. No software, AI account, paid plan, API use or credits are included.
Delivery by email
Manual email delivery within 2 business days after payment confirmation and receipt of the minimum delivery details, unless a different date is expressly agreed before purchase. Confirm the exact date before paying. This is the offer commitment, not a measured delivery speed.
ZIP attachment, manually sent
The kit is sent as a file to the email address you provide after manual order and payment checks. This page does not take payment or automatically send files.
Time to read it.
Room to change your mind.
14-day commercial refund guarantee
Cancel before delivery, or ask for a full refund for any reason within 14 calendar days, counted from the day after successful, accessible delivery. A failed delivery does not start the period. Downloading or using the files does not remove this guarantee.
Request through WhatsApp +55 31 99367-9889. No administration fee. We process refunds without undue delay, within 14 days of the request, or sooner where mandatory law requires. Your mandatory rights remain available.
Read the full cancellation & refund policyBefore you ask
for the kit.
Is this software or an AI subscription?
You need a way to unzip and read text/PDF files. Running a prompt requires your own suitable AI account or text environment; no app installation or compatibility is confirmed for this release. Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini apps have not been tested. Accounts, paid plans, APIs, media tools and credits are not included. Final production uses your own professional tools.
Will it work in Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini?
Those apps have not been tested for this release. The displayed trial used Codex and a fictional text input. Choose and verify your own suitable text environment. Media generation, APIs and professional finishing tools are separate.
What was tested, and what am I buying?
Completed internal review, 31 October 2026: five fictional en-US cases in Codex CLI 0.166.0, with a one-line prompt, a good prompt and the original skill. Each response was assessed against five frozen binary rubric criteria. The skill met 25/25 criteria; the good prompt met 25/25 and the one-line prompt 23/25. The skill scored above the good prompt in 0/5 cases and did not pass the predefined threshold of three strict case wins. Ties did not count as wins. This was a local agent assessment of written responses, without external professional validation. The requested model was gpt-6.1-sol, recorded in the headers but not independently confirmed by model JSON. These are documentary rubric results, not measured time savings, productivity, finished media quality, app compatibility or general superiority. Rubric limits remain: some design checks required a CTA absent from the brief; some copy checks required source IDs for supplied conditions without IDs. The rubric was not changed after seeing the outputs.
The offer is the documented curation of 20 main items, with written workflows, guides, examples and licences. Codex is the trial environment; Codex and other AI apps, accounts and subscriptions are not included in your purchase.
What is included in the price?
One original skill, 19 adapted third-party prompts, the guide and the separate free extras described above. This is a one-time digital kit price. Confirm all final charges before payment.
When will I receive the ZIP?
Manual email delivery within 2 business days after payment confirmation and receipt of the minimum delivery details, unless a different date is expressly agreed before purchase. Confirm the exact date before paying. This is the offer commitment, not a measured delivery speed.
Can I use client material?
Use fictional or authorised, appropriately redacted material. Check rights and your chosen provider’s data practices first. Do not send confidential client files or sensitive information through the order conversation.
How do I cancel or report a delivery issue?
Contact WhatsApp +55 31 99367-9889 with the minimum details needed to locate your order. You can cancel before delivery; the additional commercial guarantee and mandatory rights are explained in the refund policy.
A question for your next project
Before exporting, how would you verify a proposed cut against its transcript and the source media?
For your own reflection. No answer or contact details are collected here.